thanks! can you see the big difference in quality between here and dA? :( tried it all, JPG and PNG, bigger size, smaller size, changed the resolution...
the surface of the image. what frustrated me is that a big part of why this is an appealing image, is the quality of the grain. i got that result while using my 50 mm lens with a very large aperture (chinese for you, i know) but i rarely had this image quality before. from now on i'm not leaving the house without it :D
:D yes, why did i think that you won't be interested in that!? during those past years i forgot all about the photography technical terms and i had to read about it again, even check y camera manual to refresh my memory. i should've known you'll have more focus than me.
gorgeous! and wonderfully evocative.
ReplyDeletethanks!
Deletecan you see the big difference in quality between here and dA? :(
tried it all, JPG and PNG, bigger size, smaller size, changed the resolution...
i see a difference but to my eye not a huge one - might not have noticed if you hadn't said something. still, it's there.
Deletethe surface of the image. what frustrated me is that a big part of why this is an appealing image, is the quality of the grain. i got that result while using my 50 mm lens with a very large aperture (chinese for you, i know) but i rarely had this image quality before.
Deletefrom now on i'm not leaving the house without it :D
i used to have a 35mm SLR camera, you can tell me about aperture and stuff :P
Delete:D yes, why did i think that you won't be interested in that!? during those past years i forgot all about the photography technical terms and i had to read about it again, even check y camera manual to refresh my memory. i should've known you'll have more focus than me.
Deletewell it's just that i'm - uh - not old exactly - but my memory goes waaaay back :-D cameras, stereo turntables, comic books, all that stuff :lol:
Delete